Subscribe to: Magazine Email Newsletter RSS Feed LinkedIn Twitter

BLOG
  Print   


Changing Consumer Behavior?


By Tom Branna


Could it be that the U.S. consumer is finally adopting my “good is good enough” attitude when it comes to products?

For years, I have insisted that I don’t need the best when it comes to consumer products. From TVs to cars to shave cream, I’ve always settled for lower-priced products, reasoning that products that do just an “OK job” are fine with me. It all stems from being über-cheap and not deriving any pleasure from the majority of material goods.

Now, it seems, I’m not alone and it could have implications for consumer packaged goods companies. According to a recent study by McKinsey, in any given category, an average of 18% of consumer-packaged-goods consumers bought lower-priced brands in the past two years. Of the consumers who switched to cheaper products, 46% said they performed better than expected, and the large majority of these consumers said the performance of such products was much better than expected. As a result, 34% of the switchers said they no longer preferred higher-priced products, and an additional 41% said that while they preferred the premium brand, it “was not worth the money.”

As a result, McKinsey researchers argue, a growing number of consumers are now in play for makers of lower-priced products. The percentage up for grabs varies by category and depends on how many consumers switch from higher-priced brands, their experience with cheaper ones, and the way they revise their buying intentions. For example, only 12% of beer buyers switched to cheaper brands. Of those, 31% said that their experience was more positive than they had expected, which means that only about 4% of customers are in play. Among buyers of cold and allergy medicines, however, more than 20% tried a lower-priced option, and 48% of those consumers said the experience was better than expected. That means 10% of the people who buy cold and allergy medicines are now in play, according to McKinsey.

The same could be true in CPG categories close to my heart, namely household and personal care products. But I’m inclined to think that all it takes to break the McKinsey theory is the green eye of envy. Once the one well-heeled consumer starts spending lavishly again and it won’t be long before everybody on the block just “has to have it.” That goes for electronics, appliances, cars and ultimately, cosmetics too.





Add a comment

* All fields are required
Name:
Email:
You will receive an email to confirm your comment
Comment:
* HTML is not allowed
 

Need Another Reason to Clean?
Studies show housework reduces feelings of psychological distress.… »
Estée Lauder's Love Your Lips
Limited edition lipcolor collection debuted this week.… »
Zoya Reverie for Spring 2010
Here's a review of Zoya’s latest nail polish colors—including one of our favorites.… »
Urban Decay Spring 2010 Collection
A review of Urban Decay’s latest eyeshadows, primers and more.… »
The Single Load-Double Wash Laundry Predicament
New Maytag appliance puts an end to the dilemma.… »
Dr. Sushil Suri on The Single Load-Double Wash Laundry Predicament
An excellent contribution for these days of high work load, lesser time for Domestic chores besides… »
N. Pokoluk on Beauty Buzz: CND Colour & Effects
La Roche-Posay DERM AOX is said to be the first anti-glycation/anti-oxidant anti-aging skin care pro… »
Dennis on Beauty Buzz: Benefit Coralista
I need to buy Perfumer's Alcohol INCI: SDA 40B 200 proof, isopropyl myristate, isopropyl alcohol.… »
SOVAKAR NAYAK on Beauty Buzz: Benefit Coralista
OUR WEBADDRESS IS PALMSRESOURCES.COM… »

Please visit our Sister Sites:

    

Copyright © 2010 Rodman Publishing / HAPPI. All Rights Reserved. All rights reserved. Use of this constitutes acceptance of our Privacy Policy
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Rodman Publishing / HAPPI.